Magic Accuracy Skill: Difference between revisions

From PegasusXI Wiki
imported>BG-Wiki import
Imported from the BG-Wiki archive (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
 
m Rebrand: \[https?:\/\/(?:[\w-]+\.)*bluegartr\.com[^\s\]]*\s+([^\]]*)\] -> \1
 
Line 10: Line 10:
*The original explanation regarding the introduction of the Magic Accuracy Skill statistic on weapons equating +1 Magic Accuracy Skill to +1 Magic Accuracy is the correct interpretation of its operation: [https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/37600-Macc-No-longer-displayed?p=473450&viewfull=1#post473450 2013 Dev post, English notes], [https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/29223-%E3%83%90%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%83%A7%E3%83%B3%E3%82%A2%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E3%82%92%E8%AA%9E%E3%82%8B%E3%82%B9%E3%83%AC?p=473383#post473383 2013 Dev post, Japanese version.]
*The original explanation regarding the introduction of the Magic Accuracy Skill statistic on weapons equating +1 Magic Accuracy Skill to +1 Magic Accuracy is the correct interpretation of its operation: [https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/37600-Macc-No-longer-displayed?p=473450&viewfull=1#post473450 2013 Dev post, English notes], [https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/29223-%E3%83%90%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%83%A7%E3%83%B3%E3%82%A2%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E3%82%92%E8%AA%9E%E3%82%8B%E3%82%B9%E3%83%AC?p=473383#post473383 2013 Dev post, Japanese version.]


*[https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/353-%E6%95%99%E3%81%88%E3%81%A6%EF%BC%81%E9%96%8B%E7%99%BA%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%EF%BC%81?p=580393&viewfull=1#post580393 Dev Post, 2016], [https://www.bluegartr.com/threads/112776-Dev-Tracker-Findings-Posts-(NO-DISCUSSION)?p=6713767&viewfull=1#post6713767 BG Forum dev post translation]
*[https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/353-%E6%95%99%E3%81%88%E3%81%A6%EF%BC%81%E9%96%8B%E7%99%BA%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%EF%BC%81?p=580393&viewfull=1#post580393 Dev Post, 2016], BG Forum dev post translation
**This is incorrect, the values shown here are assuming +1 Magic Accuracy Skill = 0.5 Magic Accuracy above and below 50% hit rate.
**This is incorrect, the values shown here are assuming +1 Magic Accuracy Skill = 0.5 Magic Accuracy above and below 50% hit rate.
*[https://luteff11.livedoor.blog/archives/48945119.html Lute's Blog testing in response to Dev post, part 1]
*[https://luteff11.livedoor.blog/archives/48945119.html Lute's Blog testing in response to Dev post, part 1]

Latest revision as of 22:05, 29 August 2026

Magic Accuracy Skill is a 1:1 ratio of skill:magic accuracy.

  • This is different from how melee based combat skills calculate accuracy in tiers, and at less than 1:1 after 200 skill.
  • This attribute is found on all item level weapons that can be equipped in the main hand.
  • Only the main hand weapon's Magic Accuracy Skill affects Magic Accuracy, for Dual Wield balance.

See also:

References

  • Dev Post, 2016, BG Forum dev post translation
    • This is incorrect, the values shown here are assuming +1 Magic Accuracy Skill = 0.5 Magic Accuracy above and below 50% hit rate.
  • Lute's Blog testing in response to Dev post, part 1
  • Lute's Blog testing in response to Dev post, part 2
    • If the magic accuracy return were actually 2:1 as the Dev post claims then Lute would have seen a drastic difference in their results.
      • This also would make no logical sense given that it would give magic accuracy a significant decrease in gains compared to melee skill accuracy increases.
        • Mages by design often have to hit somewhat similar quantities of magic accuracy against endgame foes as a melee player would. All of which depend on the foe's level, INT, and Resistance Rank. Further, the magic accuracy+ on equipment for mages is very similar to that of melees in quantity.
          • E.g. V20 Ongo requires a melee hit rate of ~1,241 to cap while a bursted earth spell requires 1,222 magic accuracy or a free nuke requires 1,365. A magic accuracy skill of 2:1 on a weapon would make a dramatic difference in hitting these numbers.
          • We do not observe this handicap in endgame, and the testing verifies the Dev post is confused, and incorrect.